Still trying to make sense out of NOAA's "support" of bluefin tuna protection

Here is the official and puzzling statement saying the USA "supports" protecting the bluefin tuna. The best option we were hoping for was NOAA to "Co-Sponsor" protecting the bluefin. I am still working my connections to understand what this positioning means but in the meantime here's the official statement from the NOAA site;

"Statement from Dr. Jane Lubchenco, Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere and NOAA Administrator, Announcing Support for Listing Atlantic Bluefin Tuna on International Trade Endangered Species List


October 14, 2009

The United States today announced that it will seek the strongest possible management for the conservation of Atlantic bluefin tuna, a fish which is in serious trouble.

This action has two components.

First, we are sending a clear and definitive statement to the international community that the status quo is not acceptable.

Over the past 40 years, the international body that manages bluefin tuna, the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT), has overseen a 72 percent decline in the adult population of the eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean stock of bluefin tuna and an 82 percent decline in the adult population of the western Atlantic stock.

In recent years, the countries that fish the eastern stock, which spawns in the Mediterranean, have done so at two to three times the sustainable level, causing a significant and rapid decline in the last decade. The status of the western stock, which spawns in the Gulf of Mexico and is fished primarily off the North American coast, has recently stabilized due to the establishment of well-enforced, science-based quotas.

A sustained lack of science-based management for the eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean stock of bluefin tuna, and concerns about slow recovery in the west, have brought us to this point. As a member in ICCAT, the United States calls for strong and definitive action at the November 2009 meeting in Brazil. This includes establishing management measures that end overfishing such as setting responsible science-based quotas, stronger enforcement of these quotas, and closures during spawning periods.

Second, the United States strongly supports Monaco’s proposal to list Atlantic bluefin tuna under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) to prohibit international trade of the species. The United States will consider amending or withdrawing support for the Monaco proposal if ICCAT adopts significantly strengthened management and compliance measures.

Improving international fishery management and ending illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing are high priorities for the United States government, Congress, commercial and recreational fishermen, and conservationists.

NOAA understands and predicts changes in the Earth's environment, from the depths of the ocean to the surface of the sun, and conserves and manages our coastal and marine resources."

Views: 1

Tags: Bluefin, NOAA, Tuna

Comment by elephantmarch on October 19, 2009 at 9:42pm
Well, it certainly sounds promising. And while this could be an empty promise, one would think they'd have to make a more vague or "non-committal" statement if they didn't take it seriously.

Still if one decides to be pessimistic about this statement, one certainly won't be disappointed if they are then "shut up" about it afterwards.
Comment by Thunnus Thynnus on October 21, 2009 at 3:06pm
Here's the deal... the US would rather not have CITES listing b/c it could deal a fatal blow to its already battered commercial bluefin fishery. However it understands that status quo in the Mediterranean will destroy stocks and probably bring about the doom of the US fishery over the long term (because of stock mixing). So in an attempt to have its fishery and fish remain, the US is using CITES as leverage over ICCAT to get its act in gear.

So if the members of "Club Med" play nice at the next ICCAT meeting and take a big hit to quota and promise to step up enforcement, then the US will back off CITES. But if ICCAT and its delegates don't behave themselves, then the US will support the CITES listing. Hopefully all the officials involved will have the courage act responsibly.

I generally tend to favor stronger conservation measures. I am also quick to fault US fisheries policy. However, assuming the US makes good on its CITES threats, this seems like a very reasonable course of action.

Comment

You need to be a member of Save The Bluefin Tuna to add comments!

Join Save The Bluefin Tuna

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2012   Created by John LoGioco.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service